SPX, COMPQ, TRAN, BKX: We NEED to Understand the Difference Between "Cause" and "Catalyst"

So, we all know the stock market was in a historic bubble -- in fact, that was the point of the chart I posted in August of last year, showing that SPX had roughly tripled in a parabolic move that began in 2020.

Then again, maybe I shouldn’t say “we all know,” because apparently a lot of people don’t — because you hear it echoed everywhere now: “Tariffs caused the crash!”  This is one of those statements that sounds right, but is fundamentally wrong.  

If you're driving drunk with your eyes closed and I sneeze and you jerk the wheel and crash, you might say I "caused you" to crash.  But that's inaccurate for the same reason: The crash wasn’t caused by my sneeze. It was caused by the fact you were driving drunk with your eyes closed.

In other words, you placed yourself in a position where a crash was the inevitable outcome of your actions -- and that outcome was effectively guaranteed, one way or another.  If I hadn't sneezed, the road would have eventually curved and you'd have run right off it, even without me.

Now, in the case of both my sneeze and Trump's tariffs, you could correctly say they were each the catalyst for the crash.  But they were not the root cause -- and I can prove that with today's charts.

Starting with this one:

And for exhibit 2 (or exhibit 3, if we count the very first chart), we have BKX, which shows an impulsive decline from its 2022 peak, which was labeled "1/A" at the time -- meaning 2/B and 3/C would still be needed.  In fact, in April of last year -- long before tariffs -- I reminded everyone of the lingering 35+/- target for red 3/C down.

Long time readers know I'm allergic to BS from any side of the political aisle.  I try to align, first and foremost, with truth -- even, and especially, when it's uncomfortable.  This isn’t about tribal politics.  It’s about one thing:

We need to learn these lessons once and for all.  

Because if we blame the wrong things, as we ALWAYS DO, then we won't learn anything.  Just like we learned nothing in 2020.  And in 2008.  And in 2000.  And basically every year since the Fed took it upon itself to act as a market participant.

And learning nothing would mean we'll repeat the same mistakes yet again (as we always have).

The lesson is that the Fed cannot endlessly support the market with liquidity created from thin air.  

The lesson is that free markets should remain free.  

The lesson is that endless debt is unsustainable.

So it is to the benefit of all of us -- and to all future generations -- if we resist the urge to behave tribally and instead behave rationally and ethically.

Even if you hate Trump with a passion (and plenty of people do), I urge you to please resist joining the chorus of uninformed pundits.  Instead, argue for the truth as often as you can.  

Blaming "the other tribe" is easy. Telling the truth is hard, especially when it's unpopular. 

But only one of those prevents us from repeating these errors forever.

Now let’s get to the remaining charts.  COMPQ has just about reached its first target/inflection zone (this zone is plus/minus a bit, as they all usually are).  The question is whether the first "?" generates a bounce, or if the market falls right through this.  

Keep in mind that if this is (in TRAN and BKX) WAVE 3 of a SUPERCYCLE DECLINE -- then it could very well turn into a historic crash.  So whether these support zones will do anything at all is an open question, and bulls are running out of chances to stick save this thing.

Let's look at an even longer term chart of COMPQ.  This is one of the charts that kept me bullish during the 2020 Covid crash (the annotations from that time are still on the chart, in fact):

Finally, let's end this with SPX:

In conclusion, if bulls can't get anything going soon and this is indeed the start of a Supercycle decline (Primary/Cycle wave 3/c down in TRAN and BKX and Primary 1 down in SPX, INDU, etc.), then this is only the beginning and we're years away from the bottom.  This is a very dangerous market right now.  I keep looking for "long term bull options" and there are still some stragglers -- for now -- but bulls do need to get something going to keep any hope alive whatsoever.  The lower the market goes, the deeper the technical damage.  Trade safe. 

SPX, INDU, COMPQ, NYA: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

So what do you want to look at first here?  The ugliest thing?  Or the best-case scenario?  Let's start with the ugly, I guess.

Here's the ugly, via a chart I called attention to back in August of 2024, specifically because it was so ugly:

But let us ask:  Could the ugly become uglier?  (i.e.- could the market ultimately keep rallying? ("ultimately" meaning after the current wave runs itself out, not immediately.))

And the answer is, perhaps surprisingly, YES.  It could -- if we were to make the assumption that the 2020 low was the start of wave 5 and the wave from 2022 to present is actually wave 3 of 5 and not 5 of 5.  That seems less likely based on other long-term counts -- but it's not impossible.  So let's look at one way that could play out:

This chart discusses all this from a slightly different perspective:

The above chart seems to think we should still be looking lower either way -- but why does it think that?  Well, the obvious answer can be found in INDU.  It's pretty hard to see the decline from the black bull 3/C label as anything other than three waves.  Which means it's incomplete (it requires 5 waves).  The short-term bull stick save would be to turn yesterday's low into a b-wave, then rally back up to snag the old T2, THEN decline again.  But it's hard to see how the decline ends here, either way.

The next chart returns us to SPX, where we see a similar situation:

Now we move on to COMPQ, where we find similar options (COMPQ could get away with one long wave down to the first red "?" to mark its corrective decline, *if* it were forming a corrective decline):

Finally, we end with NYA, which shows a similar "near-term bearish, still intermediate bullish" possibility.  For NYA, if we were trying to find a bull count, the black a/1 would be W and bull Y would reach c = a parity roughly where the label is -- to complete a double zigzag.  (An extension of c would put Y down near the blue bear (3) label.)

Amazingly, that WXY count is NOT as far-fetched as it might seem -- if you'll recall, there was some question a few months back as to whether the black ending diagonal might actually be a b-wave.  The WXY would reconcile it as a b-wave.

In conclusion, to make things as clear as possible:  There appear to be low odds that the market will escape without more downside from here, so bears are probably in the clear for the time being.  But -- once we get that downside, bulls will have a "last call" chance to flip everything back to their favor.  

While that currently "seems" less likely, given the direction everything appears to be headed, directions can change -- and the current patterns could allow it -- so we'll keep it in mind and watch carefully when those inflection zones arrive.  Trade safe.  

SPX and INDU: Ape Roll Begins

Yesterday was the first day of Ape Roll, which is always challenging, since you have to hope someone who's part of a small group asks you what month it is, just so you can give the traditional reply, "It's April, fools!"  (If only one person asks, you can say, "It's April, fool!" but you're violating tradition.)

We're just going to look at two charts today, to narrow the focus, starting with INDU.  INDU has shown relative strength over the past couple sessions.  The chart notes the next important levels:

Next is SPX, which broke its prior low, but did not sustain trade (or closes, obviously) below that zone:

In conclusion, be aware that if bears can stall this bounce and reverse back below the recent lows, we could be in for an ugly decline in the wake of that.  The bullish near-term option might see SPX make another run at black... which could even open up more bullish options were that to occur.  But the big key now seems to be for bulls to hold those recent lows long enough to get a bounce going.  Trade safe.

SPX, INDU, COMPQ, NYA: Important Test

A lot of charts again today, so we'll let those do the talking.  (Note there's a page break you have to click.)

Gray 3/C is looking more difficult for bulls by the day, though their best hope might be a complex move that revisits the low and then rallies back up:

COMPQ at a few different time frames:

SPX, INDU, COMPQ: The Battle Lines Have Now Been Drawn

Last update noted that most markets had reached their first upside targets/inflection zones and the market has since stalled.  We'll start with INDU, which captured dead-center of its first target zone:

SPX next, which remains stalled at its red resistance line:

And finally, two looks at COMPQ, staring with the near-term, where we can see another wave down would make for five waves down:

And then COMPQ's bigger picture, which suggests lower prices would break the long-term uptrend:

In conclusion, if bears can sustain trade and closes below this month's low, it would suggest two main options:

1. --As seen on COMPQ, that new low could be a fifth wave, which (in its most bullish form) wouldn't be devastating, just scary (see blue (5)).  If it were to extend, it could be devastating.
2. --In SPX, the new low (if it occurs) could be either a small fifth, or the start of a LARGER DEGREE third wave.  If it were the latter, it could, again, be quite devastating.
3. --So, the moral of the story is, bulls should be VERY CAUTIOUS in the event of sustained trade and closes below the monthly low.  Yes, it could bounce shortly thereafter (in the event of the fifth wave mentioned at the start)... but it would have the potential to become a relentless decline, in the event of the third wave or extended fifth.

All that said, the first thing bears need to do is BREAK that low.  And while that's looking "possible" right now, it's absolutely not a given yet.  So: the flip side of the coin is that bears should be very cautious in the event that the market sustains trade north of this week's high.  

Trade safe.

p.s.-- I'm continuing to aggregate -- and add new material -- at Substack:

(This one was pretty popular upon original release. If you remember it from its original 2013 release, then you're officially an "old timer" 'round these here parts.)

The Psychology of Discouragement: How Traders (and Everyone Else!) Sabotage Themselves

Three psychological traps that quietly sabotage everyone -- and how to break free before they break you.

SPX, NYA, INDU: First Upside Targets Captured

Since last update, the market has performed exactly as expected, with INDU and SPX both reaching their first target zones:

INDU:

INDU's slightly larger chart still suggests possible problems for bears, who will need to break the March low to get themselves back in the game:

Finally, NYA (pronounced "enya" or "nyaaah," depending on whether you're north or south of the Mason Dixon line) continues to look like three large waves down:

In conclusion, as we can see most clearly on that final chart, if bears can't break below the March lows, then the structure favors this year's dual legs down as being an ABC.  That said, in the event that bears DID break below the March lows from here, particularly on accelerating momentum, then look out below, as we could be dealing with a large bear nest.  But for now, bullls have held things together right where they needed to.  Trade safe.

INDU, SPX, COMPQ, NYA, Gold: Bulls Still in the Game

Exactly a week ago (and in each update since), I warned bears that it was a good time to start being cautious, and today we'll see why (because I could see a week ago what problems it might create if we got HERE).  Now, the charts took longer than usual tonight (or "this morning" for everyone who doesn't live on an island in the middle of the Pacific) so now I have to rush and hope I don't forget... whaddayacallit... anything.

First up is whatever chart I pull up first:

Looks like I chose INDU's near-term chart, which is a great place to start and build our thesis from.  So we can see on that chart that it appears likely INDU has a bit more rally left in it (if not more than "a bit").

Now, let's look at why this might be an issue for bears:

Next is INDU's very long-term chart, to see if another bull run COULD be justified in the charts -- and it could.  Doesn't mean it WILL -- just that it could.

Next is NYA -- no change to the annotation: